|
First in a series on election problems in battleground states.
Most polls show that President Bush and Senator John Kerry are
in a dead heat in the race to win Ohio. This means that Ohioans are
not only overdosing on campaign ads and visits by the candidates, they also
now live in a state where it is especially important that the rules of the election
are clear, new voters are welcomed into the system, and all the votes are accurately
counted.
Unfortunately, a number of actions have been taken in recent weeks that threaten
to undercut those goals. In many instances, election administrators have been
using provisions of the Help America Vote Actenacted in the wake of the
2000 election debacle to improve the voting processto actually impede eligible
citizens from voting.
Registration
A few weeks ago, the secretary of state of Ohio, Kenneth Blackwell, issued
a directive that all voter registration forms be on heavy, eighty-pound paper
stock, saying that lightweight cards could be shredded by postal equipment.
The secretary since has retreated from that stance, but there
is concern that some election offices may have thrown out registrations
that were on the lighter paper while the directive was in effect.
Under HAVA, new voter registration forms are supposed to include a box for
the registrant to enter his driver's license number of the last four digits
of his social security number. If the registrant has neither, the state must
assign him a unique identifier. This is for the purpose of setting up a statewide
voter registration database which Ohio, like most states, has not set up yet.
Blackwell ordered election boards to reject any form submitted in person that
did not include the voter's driver's license number or last four digits of the
voter's Social Security number. The only way a registrant's form would not be
rejected is if he or she wrote the word "none" in the box requiring
the number. Since
he did not require this for mail-in registrations and the information is not
required by HAVA this year, the Democratic Party sued . A judge ruled
in favor of Blackwell, primarily because, "There simply is no time to develop
the factual record before the election to determine why people did not complete
box 10 in spite of the clear indication on the form that the information was
required."
Voter ID
Under the Help America Vote Act, only a very small segment of the electorate
is required to show identification when registering or voting. Nonetheless,
in the Ohio presidential primary in March, the Cleveland Plain Dealer
reported that the voter empowerment coordinator for the NAACP received at least
fifty phone calls from black voters who were required to present identification
in Cuyahoga Countya suspiciously high number considering that, according
to the Cuyahoga country board of elections, a total of only 185 voters in the
whole jurisdiction were required under HAVA to present identification. A leader
of the Greater Cleveland Voter Registration Coalition also received such calls
from black voters. For several hours, all
voters in one polling place were mistakenly required to show identification
before being allowed to vote.
The League of Women Voters challenged a directive by the secretary of state
that if a first time voter who registered by mail does not have identification
when voting, that voter's provisional ballot will not count unless the voter
somehow produces ID by the end of Election Day. HAVA states that the decision
as to whether a provisional vote will count or not is subject to state law.
Ohio state law does not require identification. Nonetheless, a federal judge
upheld the ID requirement because voters
can comply by verbally providing a drivers license number or the last
four digits of their social security number.
Provisional Ballots
Under HAVA, any voter who does not appear on the voter list or is told by the
poll official he or she is not eligible to vote, but believes he is a registered
voter in that jurisdiction, has the right to cast a provisional, or paper ballot,
the legitimacy of which will be determined later. The purpose of the provision
was to ensure that no voter would be turned away from the polls.
The Secretary of State of Ohio issued a directive that provisional ballots
should not be given to voters who appear in the wrong polling place. The Democrats
sued. A federal judge ordered the Secretary of State to develop a new directive
that would permit Ohio voters who show up at the wrong precinct to cast a provisional
ballot. He also ruled that Ohio must count these ballots in all statewide races,
including the presidential race, if the voter is registered elsewhere within
the same county.
When the Secretary of State submitted his new directive, the judge responded
by saying, "The exigencies requiring the relief being ordered herein are
due to the failure of the defendant to fulfill his duty not only to this Court,
as its injunction directed him to do, but more importantly, to his failure to
do his duty as Secretary of State to ensure that the election laws are upheld
and enforce
The proposed directive is every bit as much in violation of
HAVA [as the first one]
[Secretary] Blackwell apparently seeks to accomplish
the same result in Ohio in 2004 that occurred in Florida in 2000."
Nonetheless, late Saturday night, the
Sixth Circuit reversed this decision and the Democrats decided not to
appeal. Provisional ballots cast in the wrong polling place will NOT be counted
in Ohio. More than 100,000 provisional votes were cast in the 2000 election.
Machines
HAVA provided $325 million for the replacement of punch card and lever machines.
Ohio originally planned on replacing all punch card voting machines in time
for this November's election, but just four of thirty-one Ohio counties did
so. Not only are punch card machines known to fail to count votes more often
than any other machine, a recent study by the Columbus
Dispatch found that black voters in the state were three times more likely
to have their vote go uncounted in 2000 using the punch cards.
The latest development to deter legitimate voters is a plan to challenge peoples'
right to vote when they arrive at the voting booth. Last Friday, the Republican
Party preemptively filed challenges to over 35,000 new voter registrations in
Ohio. The basis
for the challenges is that a postcard sent to the registrants by the
Party was returned as undeliverable.
However, according to the Columbus Dispatch, it now appears many
of the filed will be rejected "because of a glitch in the computer program
used to prepare the filings. In many cases, addresses for voters were incorrect
or the challenges were filed in the wrong precinct." The
Republicans have withdrawn thousands of challenges.
Moreover,
the paper says, in Cuyahoga County, a heavily Democratic area, "Where
the largest number of challenges were filed, officials also have found problems.
In a 'really limited' review of some of the 17,717 challenges there, officials
found a number with outdated addresses
In Franklin County, beyond the
challenges with incorrect information, it appears Republicans included some
legitimately registered voters, including members of the military."
Meanwhile, according to the New York Times, both
parties have been recruiting poll site monitors to make and defend challenges.
"Republicans said they had enlisted 3,600 by the deadline, many in heavily
Democratic urban neighborhoods of Cleveland, Dayton and other cities. Each recruit
was to be paid $100. The Democrats, who tend to benefit more than Republicans
from large turnouts, said they had registered more than 2,000 recruits to try
to protect legitimate voters rather than weed out ineligible ones."
Even if not a single one of these challenges is successful, the heightened
challenge process will be successful in causing long lines at polling sites
and wait times that some voters cannot abide.
Tova Andrea Wang is a program officer and Democracy Fellow at The Century
Foundation. She is most recently the author of an issue brief entitled Playing
Games with Democracy, on how the Help America Vote Act is being used
to disenfranchise voters.
|